Friday, April 1, 2011

Carnegie's strategies just manipulation?

I wrapped up reading Dale Carnegie’s bestselling book How to Win Friends & Influence People. The book, with now over 70 years in print, lays out techniques Carnegie learned during his years in the workforce to do as the title says.

More than 15 million copies of the University of Central Missouri grads book have been sold, and for good reason. Carnegie lays out practical ways to make friends, family or coworkers comfortable with you and be more inclined to act in a way that is beneficial to you.

No one questions the books effectiveness.

But, about three quarters of the way through, I began to wonder if these ideas are grounded in strong moral footing. With sections titled “Six Ways to Make People like You”, it’s easy to become a bit queasy, especially if you live by my mother’s “be yourself” rule.

On the other hand, it’s not as if Carnegie is saying you should change your entire persona. Much of Carnegie’s advice is more about tweaking your everyday encounters in ways that subtle yet surprisingly effective.

Case in point: I’m not much of a smile-er unless I’m laughing. One subsection advised me on “how to make a good first impression.” The advice was to smile at the beginning and during conversations or when meeting someone new. So I began smiling. I smiled when shaking hands, waving at people and answering questions. Perhaps it was a “placebo effect” of some sort, but my interactions seemed to have more of a positive outcome.

But was I being deceptive?

My motives were not one of being genuinely happy to see the person, rather to make the person more prone to do something for me later on.

In my opinion, moral gray areas are inevitable. As long as I’m not using Carnegie’s strategies with nefarious intentions, I do not feel guilty if I smile more frequently or feign interest in a subject someone is perhaps more enthralled in than I. Likewise, nowhere in Carnegie’s book does he advocate anything but pure intentions.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Lawyers better option than businessmen for president?

“The word 'politics' is derived from the word 'poly', meaning 'many', and the word 'ticks', meaning 'blood sucking parasites”—Larry Hardiman.

Outside of individuals in prisons, there are few people more despised than those residing in Washington D.C. Yet, when we get the opportunity to elect a “political outsider” to the highest office in the land it’s scoffed at.

Enter Donald Trump and Herman Cain.

Could they do any worse than our recent leaders attempts to revive the economy? Keep in mind, the majority of our politicians come from law backgrounds, not business. Many—our current President included—have never even had a job in the private sector.

Should we really be surprised that TARP and the Stimulus Package did virtually nothing to create jobs?

Polls done by Pew, Rasmussen and others consistently show that American’s main concern is jobs. I don’t go to my lawyer for help with my nonexistent stock situation, why would we go to Lawyers for help with our jobs situation?

Trump and Cain, the two most prominent outsider candidates as of now, would need to show that they could be effective leaders in regards to foreign affairs and socially conservative issues (a lost demographic lately). But why would we believe that Harvard lawyers would be stronger in war time situations than business men?

Personally, I’d rather see Cain run. This election will be more about President Obama than the Republican challenger and Cain has less downside (and more upside). Just Google “Herman Cain Bill Clinton”.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Hello Clarice...

I suppose introductions are in order.

I am a 21 year-old Communications major, columnist for the Muleskinner (the University of Central Missouri's student newspaper), reporter for Collegenews.com and lonely libertarian on a college campus.

I hope that this blog will allow me to comment on everything from politics to opening moves for white in chess. TV shows like Breaking Bad, Dexter and It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia are not off limits either, as my nerd-dom is not limited to studies.

Hopefully I can develop a consistent readership.

Thanks,

Michael Bartlett